Refuting

 Gold model 50% of miners as the one sent down wages, each worker income of 50,000 a year, they get a million to rent an apartment, the remaining forty to get married, have children, married and the hands of another five miners million, can make investments. because of the hands of the workers money, to be settled, so there needs a house. So mine used his money to build a house, leased workers, or sold to workers. workers eat and drink, so to open the hotel, the workers and his money and then get it back. Kaifan Guan also employed other workers, so the wife has employment opportunities for workers, but also get paid. a family of consumer demand is even greater. In this way, a few years later , in the parts of the 100 families. children to school, with educational needs, so some people to run schools, workers have to date, to consumption, to do something else, so have a movie theater, with shops, so that After 50 years in the past, when this place a mine about to be dug when the light here has become a thriving city of around 10 million people.
while the second is this: Suppose also found a gold mine, The same was to invest in mining, also employed 100 workers, the same profit 10 million per year, but the mine owners to pay 10% of them sent down 10,000 a year per worker. The money is only enough that they barely fill the stomach, no money rent an apartment, a wife no money, only to live shack. miners earn a year of 900 million, but look at her eyes are poor, nothing in the local re-investment would be demand. So he put the money to foreign countries as simply not in the local security, he built several luxury villas, several workers employed as bodyguards, the workers have no future, in addition to hard work ends meet, there is no other demand. The only possible thing is to find ways to Me and a wife to cheat , birth to a beautiful daughter, might be able to marry mine wife. After 50 years go, this place apart from luxury villas, still no other industry. until the mines dug over, miners with large sums of money away, workers are either in exile or men for stealing, woman into prostitution. Frankly speaking, that is, can not eat can not wear gold, dug up after you sold the goods in exchange for food and clothing? let alone those you reinvest the hotel made of construction materials to build a house? sell workers? people to take a total of only to 500 million salary, how can 10 million from them in return? sold to a person other than gold? mm You're not discussing the talk about .
mine finished his wages after the 500 million left on hand. According to on. tentatively mine owners also run the farm operator, building materials, plants, etc., to achieve self-sufficiency in raw materials, do not exchange with the outside world. so good, if miners are cast into this 500 million (the amount spent tentatively ignore the miners themselves, because you can assume that he room and board to open the restaurant in their own), to build a house, building hotels. workers are to buy or rent this house, eat in the restaurants, the money is paid to get their wages.
no matter how many workers , an amount is determined. that is, add up all the money in the hands of workers, just 500 million more, no less. So that is, mine owners of these houses and restaurants, and finally can only get 500 million turnover . a little more as well. (unless people from outside come here to spend. but here are a consumer should not be considered an outsider to the issue here, because the discussion is That is, mine had only 500 million on hand. This, as all 500 million of investment costs, turned into houses and restaurants and the like. After spending round workers, miners, million and only few mm not much, because not all of the wages of all workers see themselves spend. In other words, miners can be foreseen: the year of investment in gold is absolutely stable than compensation is not earned.
but ?
then some people may say, need to invest 500 million the first year of construction of hotels and housing, but the second year, no longer cast was set. So perhaps the long term, or feasible thing.
then we Read on. to the second year can be divided into two cases. The first is a mine that they have completed the sold out. The second is the miners that case, the miners outsiders can not make money, then left with the object of making money out of workers. As mentioned above, the former miners in the first year to their 500 million on hand are used to do all kinds of gold provided outside the consumer's enterprises, and then the number will not pay more than 4.99 million yuan. That means, this year he's spending by the workers paying the money recovered less than 4.99 million yuan, is likely to be 4.98 million yuan mm because, as mentioned above, not all will appear spend all the wages of workers.
then continue doing this, declining wages, and earn back part of the mine owners are declining. So, about 500 years after the miners must go bankrupt. Of course, the miners will not wait for 500 years. If the normal brain is estimated that less than three years, then immediately quit the. So the first case the operation is not feasible.
talk about the second case. workers continue to dry gold ore, gold continues to sell outsiders. So the second year of gold income is 10 million yuan, of which 500 million for wages. then left with 4.99 million the first year, mine owners will have 9.99 million on hand . Meanwhile, wages for workers other than gold consumed enterprises mm but not all consumed, consuming only 499 million (and as the first year). then mine 4.99 million yuan. This mine has been on hand for a total of 999 +499 = 14.98 million yuan. Now the question becomes: which 14.98 million yuan I what? continue to invest in enterprises? but also wages Chengsi 500 million, and also are you sent to them. to do the business out later if you do not provide consumer, that is, up to 500 million this did not add value. that investment in what is the use? just a waste of money.
we are embarrassed to see that, when the the same dilemma: the money is nowhere to invest. The ; of logic, the only option is exactly the same as mine. other workers, so the wife has employment opportunities for workers, but also get paid. a family of consumer demand is even greater. In this way, a few years later, in the parts of the 100 families. children to school, with education demand, so some people come to schools, workers have to date, to consumption, to do something else, so have a movie theater, with the store. will change the fact that: 1, the wages of all employees and workers, mine owners are issued; 2, the mine owners of businesses outside the gold if not for the crowd, no matter how that operation, most can only be These he sent to the wages only; 3, because not all employees and workers spend all the wages, so the miners no matter how well run, can not be issued to pay all 4 more people employed, employees and workers were kept out of the wages but not the more consumption, miners can not be more. Why think mine would be so stupid?
probably argue that in fact this analogy is that the national miners, capitalists just to maximize their own interests, but the country could still do that sort of wealth with the people of wages only. for his own, the investment did not bring any added value (or rather, the increase in value can not be achieved). that such a mining area (countries) to grow? This is not the worst. the worst mine workers is something consumer spending tired of miners, with their outbound travel to save money, and to spend the money to go beyond the mining area, cheap outsiders. that mine was really tears it. < br> so visible, Politics and economics, so some common sense feeling down. In fact, do not look this eloquent argument for a long time, if the Marxist political economy is a few words to explain things: a simple distinction between reproduction and expanded reproduction. a system of surplus value generated must be transformed into the capital of foreign exchange, otherwise overproduction. In other words, is not sold out will not be able to expand production. This is what Marx said capitalism inherently expansionary reason. Now almost Marxist Economics into mice on the streets, the results have